Hahai Us
pūnaewele kūhelu »
e pili ana i:

ʻO Ubuntu Touch (ʻike pū ʻia ʻo Ubuntu Phone) he mana kelepona o ka ʻōnaehana hana ʻo Ubuntu, i hoʻomohala ʻia e ke kaiāulu UBports. Kākau ʻia ma Qt, ua hoʻolālā mua ʻia no nā polokalamu kelepona paʻi paʻi e like me nā smartphones a me nā kamepiula papa, akā ʻo ka pahuhopu mua o ka convergence i manaʻo ʻia e lawe i ka Ubuntu Touch i nā laptops, desktops, nā mea IOT, nā TV a me nā wati akamai no kahi ʻike mea hoʻohana i hui pū ʻia.

hāʻawi:
24/06/2020

I ka nānā mua ʻana e hāʻawi wau iā lākou i 2 poloka no ka mea ke hana nei lākou i kā lākou hale kūʻai ponoʻī https://open-store.io/ a ʻae lākou i nā noi pili kālepa ma laila.

24/06/2020

W.A.I.T.? What am I trading? So I was looking into the default apps that come with Ubuntu Touch (https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/blob/master/CORE_APPS.md), and they seem to be trade-free, because they don’t want to collect data or put ads in the users face. The website, where you can find an how-to-install guide (https://ubuntu-touch.io/get-ut), does collect some data via “analytics.ubports.com”. But that seems to be not for profit purposes, but probably for usability. However, there are some youtube videos embedded in the website, so I want to mention that. Back to the software itself: I’d give 3/5 blocks, because there are trade-based apps, like Amazon (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=amazon), Google (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=google), Facebook (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=facebook) etc. in their app store. Is that a reason to not include Ubuntu Touch in the directory? Hm, I mean they are not advertising these, they just give users the choice to use them. But of course, that appstore is not clean in the trade-free sense.

Waiho i ka pane

ʻAʻole e paʻi ʻia kāu leka uila. Hōʻailona ʻia nā kahua i makemake ʻia *