Ubuntu Fọwọkan
Ubuntu Fọwọkan (ti a tun mọ si foonu Ubuntu) jẹ ẹya alagbeka ti ẹrọ ṣiṣe Ubuntu, ti o ni idagbasoke nipasẹ agbegbe UBports. Ti a kọ ni Qt, o jẹ apẹrẹ nipataki fun awọn ẹrọ alagbeka iboju ifọwọkan gẹgẹbi awọn fonutologbolori ati awọn kọnputa tabulẹti, ṣugbọn ibi-afẹde atilẹba ti isọdọkan ni ipinnu lati mu Ubuntu Fọwọkan si awọn kọnputa agbeka, awọn kọnputa agbeka, awọn ẹrọ IOT, Awọn TV ati awọn iṣọ ọlọgbọn fun iriri olumulo iṣọkan pipe.
Ni wiwo akọkọ Emi yoo fun wọn ni awọn bulọọki 2 nitori wọn ṣe itọju ile itaja tiwọn https://open-store.io/ ati pe wọn gba awọn ohun elo orisun-iṣowo laaye nibẹ.
W.A.I.T.? What am I trading? So I was looking into the default apps that come with Ubuntu Touch (https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/blob/master/CORE_APPS.md), and they seem to be trade-free, because they don’t want to collect data or put ads in the users face. The website, where you can find an how-to-install guide (https://ubuntu-touch.io/get-ut), does collect some data via “analytics.ubports.com”. But that seems to be not for profit purposes, but probably for usability. However, there are some youtube videos embedded in the website, so I want to mention that. Back to the software itself: I’d give 3/5 blocks, because there are trade-based apps, like Amazon (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=amazon), Google (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=google), Facebook (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=facebook) etc. in their app store. Is that a reason to not include Ubuntu Touch in the directory? Hm, I mean they are not advertising these, they just give users the choice to use them. But of course, that appstore is not clean in the trade-free sense.