Ubuntu Touch
Ua hamanihia e te huiraatira UBports te Ubuntu Touch (o tei pii-atoa-hia te Ubuntu Phone) ei rave'a afa'ifa'i o te rave'a haaparareraa Ubuntu. Ua papa'ihia te reira na roto i te Qt, no te mau rave'a afa'ifa'i mai te mau niuniu afa'ifa'i e te mau roro uira, tera râ, te opuaraa matamua no te putuputuraa, o te afa'iraa ïa i te Ubuntu Touch i ni'a i te mau roro uira, te mau roro uira, te mau rave'a IOT, te mau afata teata, e te mau mata'i roro uira no te hoê iteraa taa ê no te taata faaohipa.
I te hi'oraa matamua, e horo'a vau ia ratou e 2 tuhaa no te mea te faatere nei ratou i ta ratou iho fare toa https://open-store.io/ e te farii nei ratou i te mau faaohiparaa i ni'a i te tapihooraa i reira.
W.A.I.T.? What am I trading? So I was looking into the default apps that come with Ubuntu Touch (https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/blob/master/CORE_APPS.md), and they seem to be trade-free, because they don’t want to collect data or put ads in the users face. The website, where you can find an how-to-install guide (https://ubuntu-touch.io/get-ut), does collect some data via “analytics.ubports.com”. But that seems to be not for profit purposes, but probably for usability. However, there are some youtube videos embedded in the website, so I want to mention that. Back to the software itself: I’d give 3/5 blocks, because there are trade-based apps, like Amazon (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=amazon), Google (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=google), Facebook (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=facebook) etc. in their app store. Is that a reason to not include Ubuntu Touch in the directory? Hm, I mean they are not advertising these, they just give users the choice to use them. But of course, that appstore is not clean in the trade-free sense.