Mulimuli mai ia Matou
ofisa 'upega tafaʻilagi »
e uiga:

O le Ubuntu Touch (lea e taʻua o le Ubuntu Telefoni) o se telefoni feaveaʻi o le Ubuntu operating system, o loʻo atiaʻe e le UBports community. Tusia i le Qt, ua fuafuaina faapitoa mo masini feaveai touchscreen e pei o smartphones ma komepiuta papa, ae o le uluai sini o le convergence na faamoemoe e aumai le Ubuntu Touch i komepiuta feaveai, komepiuta, masini IOT, TV ma matamata atamai mo se aafiaga atoatoa tagata faaaoga.

ofo atu:
24/06/2020

I le tepa muamua o le a ou tuʻuina atu ia i latou poloka 2 aua latou te faʻatautaia a latou lava faleoloa https://open-store.io/ ma latou faʻatagaina faʻatauga faʻavae iina.

24/06/2020

W.A.I.T.? What am I trading? So I was looking into the default apps that come with Ubuntu Touch (https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/blob/master/CORE_APPS.md), and they seem to be trade-free, because they don’t want to collect data or put ads in the users face. The website, where you can find an how-to-install guide (https://ubuntu-touch.io/get-ut), does collect some data via “analytics.ubports.com”. But that seems to be not for profit purposes, but probably for usability. However, there are some youtube videos embedded in the website, so I want to mention that. Back to the software itself: I’d give 3/5 blocks, because there are trade-based apps, like Amazon (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=amazon), Google (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=google), Facebook (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=facebook) etc. in their app store. Is that a reason to not include Ubuntu Touch in the directory? Hm, I mean they are not advertising these, they just give users the choice to use them. But of course, that appstore is not clean in the trade-free sense.

E

E E E