Taura na Ubuntu
2.5 mai na 5 na kalokalo (yavutaki ena 2 na railesu)
baleta na:
Ubuntu Touch (kilai talega me Ubuntu talevoni) e dua na itukutuku ni talevoni veikauyaki ni ivakarau ni cakacaka ni Ubuntu, sa vakatorocaketaki tiko mai na itikotiko ni UBports. Volai ena Qt, e vakarautaki taumada me baleta na iyaya ni talevoni veikauyaki ni touchscreen me vaka na talevoni veikauyaki kei na kompiuta ni tebeleti, Ia na inaki taumada ni convergence a kena inaki me kauta mai na Ubuntu Touch ki na laptops, katubaleka, iyaya ni IOT, TV kei na matailoilo vuku me baleta e dua na taucoko ni duavata ni vakayagataki ni veika e sotavi.
solia:
06/2020
Railesuvi ni Taura na Ubuntu
Ena imatai ni rai au na solia vei ira na 2 buloko baleta ni ra sa curate na nodra dui sitoa https://dolava-sitoa.io/ ka ra sa vakatara na veivoli-yavutaki na kerekere e kea.
06/2020
Railesuvi ni Taura na Ubuntu
W.A.I.T.? What am I trading? So I was looking into the default apps that come with Ubuntu Touch (https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/blob/master/CORE_APPS.md), and they seem to be trade-free, because they don’t want to collect data or put ads in the users face. The website, where you can find an how-to-install guide (https://ubuntu-touch.io/get-ut), does collect some data via “analytics.ubports.com”. But that seems to be not for profit purposes, but probably for usability. However, there are some youtube videos embedded in the website, so I want to mention that. Back to the software itself: I’d give 3/5 blocks, because there are trade-based apps, like Amazon (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=amazon), Google (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=google), Facebook (https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=facebook) etc. in their app store. Is that a reason to not include Ubuntu Touch in the directory? Hm, I mean they are not advertising these, they just give users the choice to use them. But of course, that appstore is not clean in the trade-free sense.